keskiviikko 18. maaliskuuta 2015

Gravitational wave theory (Basic principle and examples) 

Same in english 


Hi there! I’m Timo Huovinen, 30-year-old bioscience student from Kuopio, Finland. I have lately been studying physics, especially the theories of relativity and quantum phenomena, and other theories.

I started to wonder about gravity, what it is, like many of us. I developed my own theory based on other theories, and i came up with the solution, which in my mind fits perfectly. 

If my theory is correct, it would supplant every theory that have something to do with how matter acts (photons and electrons included). Same math applies, but we need to look at it differently.

And apologies if some of the terminology used is incorrectly, the terminology is still very new to me (and my english isn’t that great either).

Gravitational wave theory



Gravity

Gravity is caused by gravitational waves that occur between two same elements rotating around each other. This generates gravitational waves, which pulls same substance towards itself (because it matches the same wavelength as the gravitational waves). So every element has its own gravity. Bigger the atom of given substance is, the bigger the wavelength. Gravitational waves amplitude is determined by how much (and how fast) there is substance in question spinning around each other. Force of gravity depends on the distance between source of gravitational waves and the substance it is affecting. As a result, for example in the Earth, the core of which consists largely of iron, pulls strongly iron atoms (and, of course, other metals, which is close to the Earth's core). On the other hand, there aren’t that much elements, like hydrogen, in the Earth's core, so Earth doesn't pull those elements so much. But other planets, and our sun, have elements like hydrogen abundant, so they create gravitational waves on those wavelengths, and that explains why they are pulled more to the Earth's atmosphere.

This phenomenon can be observed e.g. tide phenomenon, in which the moon (43% oxygen), attract water, but also the sun (73.46% hydrogen), draws water towards itself.

This is where Newton got it wrong (according my theory):
In the vacuum solid object doesn't move (assuming gravitational waves don't rip the object apart), but everything else moves around  it, depending on how hard elements are being pulled by the planets and the stars. It seems like entropy, because the forces in the universe are so large that the material is pulled in every direction. So there are so much gravitational waves in the vacuum, that it seems like elements are being pulled to random directions.

This can be seen in this video, where feather and bowling ball drops to ground in same speed. In reality, bowling ball and feather are standing still, and earth is moving (according it's rotation speed). This is where Newtons 9,81 m/s2 comes from, which have been understood as force of gravity. This isn't so, according my theory.
If gravitational waves doesn't affect to object, let's say asteroid, then it doesn't move in vacuum.
Stars and planets keep on spinning according their orbits, but asteroid need to wait, that something comes and moves it. When, lets say Earth's orbit intersects with the location of the asteroid, two things can happen: If asteroid doesn't have same elements as Earth, they will collide. If there is same elements, then according Earth's gravity (gravitational waves of different elements in question) to asteroid, asteroid can stay in Earth's orbit (distance depends how much asteroid is pulled by Earth, and how much other stars and planets). This explains Saturns rings.


Because of this mistake, we have ”created” all these forces, like friction, pressure, temperature and so on, but all we had needed to explain everything, was gravity.

Also thinking about atoms, this could explain why the electrons orbit protons and neutrons in a given orbital, as the proton and the neuron's rotation around each other causes the gravitational waves, which are  at electrons wavelength, and the amplitude will tell you how hard it keeps them in the orbit. Therefore, electrons are so active, because their "hurdling” off from the orbit requires a relatively small force.

In chemistry it was teached (at least for me), that electrons make atoms connect (pull together). According my theory atoms use same principle of gravitational waves (orbits in chemistry). We say in chemistry that movement is heat, my theory explains where that movement comes from. If there is a molecule, like water, Hydrogen is pulled to another direction than oxygen atoms, if the force (gravity) is strong enough, they will separate (vaporize). If movement stops, water will "freeze". If balance is right, water will stay as water.



Examples
These are just examples based on my theory (ofcource to my theory to be correct, it has to explain how everything happens), because I'm not familiar enough with the phenomena / theories (i think scientists in those fields will understand it better, once they understand principle of my theory). 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This gravitational theory is (?) Experimentally demonstrated by this example. In the link below is experiment in which the rotation of the gyro will create up to a billion time the force of gravity compared to gravity on the Earth. Of course for the material in question (in this case calsiumcarbonate atoms).
So in other words, what we understand 'artificial' gravitation, is of the same gravity, what all gravitation is.
This could be the case for all particles.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let’s think about navigation of the birds. It is said in quantum mechanics, that birds navigate using magnetic fields. In my theory, those molecules have gravitation, which birds brain interpretate, and they ”know” their position on Earth. This explains also why birds fly in perfect formations, because they all get the same message from gravitational waves, so it seems that they know how other birds are going to fly. Birds just follow the same message, which gravity gives them.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Could this theory also explain superconductor? That is, when the metal atoms in Earth's core create gravitational waves, they impact metals on the Earth's surface, each according to given metals wavelength. When the metal is cooled enough, it isn’t affected by gravitational waves from Earth's core.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconductivity
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This would also explain why scales aren't accurate, because the particular material is continuously pulled in different directions, depending on which elements material has been made of, so the "weight" is changes accordingly. Therefore, the objects "weight" is different in moon than in the Earth and so on. We have always thought, that the problem is with the scale, but this isn't true. Scale is accurate, but the weight changes, depending on how the different elements in object are being pulled by gravitational waves, that planets and sun create (or any source of particular gravitational wavelength).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Theory also explains apsidal precession, because atoms of the planet is being affected by all planets, which have enough given element.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apsidal_precession
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And resonance:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-zczJXSxnw
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think this video demonstrates pretty good, how gravitational waves work.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGiiSlMFFlI
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If my theory is right, i think you can test it with an centrifuge strong enough (strong enough to create gravitational waves). Experiment is simple. You spin any given matter in the centrifuge, and observe, does it pull same matter towards centrifuge on the outside of the centrifuge. Remember caution!


I think this theory explains magnetism, electricity and others (if not all?) theories, if it is correct. I know it is difficult to accept, but we have known for a long time, that there is something wrong with the theory of gravity. To understand it correctly, of course it forces us to think things from a different point of view. I think this is the way gravity works. But if someone can tell why my theory can't be true, i would love to hear the reason. Critical thinking is the key to finding the truth.


tshuovin@gmail.com

tiistai 3. helmikuuta 2015

Gravitational wave theory (in detail)


UPDATE 9.3.2015
I started to write my theory in in greater detail, and more scientific way. It's still work in progress, but i'll update it as i write it down. =)


Gravitational wave theory

The abstract
Gravitational wave theory contradicts how we understand gravity, and how it affects on matter. Basis of my theory is, that Isaac Newton misunderstood vacuum, and because of this, his theory on gravity is incorrect. Because of this mistake, science got divided (over centuries) into different branches; physics, chemistry, cosmology and so on.
Gravitational wave theory explains how gravity works, and by doing so, it combines these different fields back together. According this theory, all matter has same basic principles, whether you look at it at atomic or cosmic level.

According gravitational wave theory, gravity is caused by gravitational waves that occur between two same substances rotating around each other. This generates gravitational waves, which pulls same substance towards itself (because it matches the same wavelength as the gravitational waves). So every element has its own gravity. Bigger the atom of given substance is, the bigger the wavelength. Gravitational waves amplitude is determined by how much (and how fast) there is substance in question spinning around each other. Force of gravity depends on the distance between source of gravitational waves and the substance that it is affecting.

In this text I explain this theory in physics point of view, as doing so it explains other fields of science as well, such as chemistry, cosmology, geology and meteorology. Of course, to this theory to be correct, it must hold true in every different field of science concerning physical interactions, but I start with physics, so the basic principle is clear.

Gravitational wave theory
I’ll start by describing the thought process that led to this theory, to make it easier to approach by reader. I have always been interested by science, as a whole, and that’s how I have been studying it. I think, to understand the universe, whole picture is needed. I have studied the basics of many different science fields, and what i have found out, there is a lot more in common in these fields, than there are differences. So, as i have studied science, I have been ”constructing” universe in my mind, as it has been taught to us. By doing so, you come to an conclusion, that different set of rules are in affect in different size scales (from atomic level to cosmic level). This has been troubling many scientist, like Albert Einstein, and numerous scientist have been working to reveal ”theory of everything”, which would combine everything in single theory. Gravitational wave theory is doing just that.
In school, I have studied basics in physics, but my journey to this theory started when I started to study physics more on my own, particularly quantum mechanics (I was interested how quantum computer would work). Quantum mechanics provides description of dual particle-like and wave-like behavior and interactions of energy and matter. Conclusion I came, was that there are waves (later i understood them as gravitational waves), on which particles like photons travel. This explained double-slit experiment.
After this, I wanted to learn about origins of such ”waves”, so I went backwards in scientific study, and I studied general relativity theory by Albert Einstein. I tried to understand movement of light (photons), as Einstein understood it, keeping in mind what I had learned about their wave-particle nature from quantum mechanics. In this point I had already read about gravitational waves (predicted by Einstein), and I thought to try how would it make photons act, if star (like sun) emitted these waves. It explained deflection of starlight by the sun (observation made during the total solar eclipse of May 29, 1919). Next problem was, how these gravitational waves came to be? It was then, when I remembered this picture, which describes how two neutron stars rotate rapidly around one another gradually losing energy by emitting gravitational radiation. I pictured how universe would look like, if gravity worked like this. Keeping in mind Newton’s theory about gravity (force of gravity depends on mass and the distance of the objects), this would have made all the matter in the universe collapse into a single object. Then I thought, what if every particle had their own gravity, and this was the mechanism how it was created. This is when pieces started to fall into their places.
There was a problem though: This went against Newton’s theory about gravity.


After this I compared this gravitational wave theory against Newton’s theory of gravity, and I understood where Newton had made his mistake:
In the vacuum solid object doesn't move (assuming gravitational waves don't rip the object apart), but everything else moves around it, depending on how hard elements are being pulled by the planets and the stars. It seems like entropy, because the gravitational forces in the universe are so strong that the substance is pulled in every direction. So there are so much gravitational waves in the vacuum that it seems like elements are being pulled to random directions. If you ”drop” two different objects in vacuum on surface of the Earth, those objects stay still, but Earth keeps moving (according it's rotation speed). This is where Newton’s 9,81 m/s2 comes from, which have been understood as force of gravity (here on Earth).
According gravitational wave theory, gravity is caused by gravitational waves that occur between two same elements rotating around each other. This generates gravitational waves, which pulls same substance towards itself (because it matches the same wavelength as the gravitational waves). So every element has its own gravity. Bigger the atom of given substance is, the bigger the wavelength. Gravitational waves amplitude is determined by how much (and how fast) there is substance in question spinning around each other. Force of gravity depends on the distance between source of gravitational waves and the substance it is affecting.
In next chapters I compare my theory with current theories, and of course observations made by scientist in different fields (as I encourage readers to do). As I said in introduction, to this theory to be correct, it must hold true in every physical interaction.

How to test gravitational wave theory experimentally
I think that easiest way to test this theory experimentally is to test it with an centrifuge strong enough (strong enough to create gravitational waves). Experiment is simple. You spin any given pure chemical substance in the centrifuge, and observe, does it pull same substance towards centrifuge on the outside of the centrifuge. If this is the case, it proves gravitational wave theory to be correct, and using same principle, we can determine how much substance in question is needed, and how fast spinning speed is required to create gravitational waves. We should also test, how using molecules affects the results.

Mathematical approach to gravitational wave theory
As I understand it, there are three factors that needs to be accounted for creating mathematical formula for this theory: amount of the given substance, rotation speed of the given substance, and the distance between source of gravitational waves and the substance that is affected by these gravitational waves. For determining ratios for these factors, experimental phase (explained in previous chapter) is needed. After we have measured these factors, we can produce mathematical formula for this theory, and we can use it to determine substance composition of Earth’s core (for example).

Physics
In this chapter I explain principles of physics according gravitational wave theory.

Fundamental forces
Fundamental interactions, also known as fundamental forces or interactive forces, are the interactions in physical systems that science haven’t been able to be reduce to more basic interactions. In following paragraphs I explain these forces according gravitational wave theory.

Strong nuclear force
According mainstream science, the strong nuclear force (also known as strong interaction) is the force that binds protons and neutrons (nucleons) together to form the nucleus of an atom. According gravitational wave theory, this interaction happens because of gravity, protons and neutrons spin around each other, creating gravitational waves, which pulls electrons and other atoms towards the center of the atom (according the strength of the gravitational pull). If gravitational wave theory is proven to be correct, I think we need to re-evaluate the nature of these subatomic particles (protons, neutrons, electrons and photons).

Weak nuclear force
According mainstream science, the weak interaction is responsible for both the radioactive decay of subatomic particles and nuclear fission.
According gravitational wave theory, each chemical substance has different gravity, because each substance has its own wavelength (force depends on gravitational sources for any given substance). When it comes to radioactive substances, their half-time (quantity of atoms falls to half its value) depends on the gravitational forces affecting given substance. Stronger the gravitational pull is, faster the radioactive substance decays.

Gravitational force
Newton's law of universal gravitation, which postulates that the gravitational force of two bodies of mass is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. This theory works well when used in Earth’s surface, but when used in atomic or cosmic scale, it starts to fail. In cosmic scale this theory needs hypothetical dark matter to work (which existence haven’t been proved). I think the biggest problem, and why gravity was so long misunderstood, was the lack of understanding the nature of the vacuum in space. Principle of gravitation by gravitational wave theory is explained in previous chapters, so in this paragraph I concentrate explaining vacuum according my theory.
According gravitational wave theory, if gravitational waves doesn't affect to object, let's say asteroid, then it doesn't move in vacuum. Stars and planets keep on spinning according their orbits, but asteroid need to wait, that something comes and moves it. When, let’s say Earth’s orbit intersects with the location of the asteroid, two things can happen: If asteroid doesn't have same elements as earth, they will collide. If there is same elements, then according Earth’s gravity (gravitational waves of different elements in question) to asteroid, asteroid can stay in Earth’s orbit
(Distance depends how much asteroid is pulled by earth, and how much by other stars and planets).

Electromagnetic force
According mainstream science, electromagnetic force is a type of physical interaction that occurs between electrically charged particles. The electromagnetic force usually manifests as electromagnetic fields, such as electric fields, magnetic fields and light.

According gravitational wave theory, principle of electromagnetism is the same as other gravity, but in this instance we concentrate on electrons. As explained in strong nuclear force-paragraph, electrons are orbiting atom’s core according gravitational pull of the atom.  When it comes to substances, like iron, which have “room” on the outer orbit of the atom, gravitational pull of that atom “attracts” electrons to the orbit of the atom (magnetism). After the atom’s orbits comes saturated with electrons, atom starts to repel excess electrons.


Conclusions

Like said in introduction, if gravitational wave theory is correct, it will merges different scientific fields (concerning physical interactions) to one. First logical step would be the experimental phase (with centrifuge-test described before, or otherwise). If those experiments give results predicted by this theory, we need to start re-evaluating science as we know it.





maanantai 2. helmikuuta 2015

Gravitaatioaalto-teoria

Olen viimeaikoina tutustunut fysiikkaan, varsinkin suhteellisuusteorioihin ja kvanttimekaniikan ilmiöihin, ja muihin teorioihin.
Harmaita hiuksia alkoi tuottaa painovoiman käsite, mitä se on. Kehittelin oman teorian muiden teorioiden pohjalta, jonka kumoamiseen ei omat älynlahjat vielä riitä, tai ainakin pitäisi opiskella enemmän fysiikkaa. 

Jos teoriani pitää paikkansa, se syrjäyttäisi kaikki teoriat, jotka yrittävät selittää miten kaikki fyysinen toimii (fotoneja ja elektroneja myöten). Sama matematiikka pätee, olemme vain katsoneet sitä väärin. 

Ja pahoittelut, jos joissain termeissä on virheitä, termistö on minulle vielä uutta.

Gravitaatioaalto-teoria


Painovoima
Painovoiman aiheuttaa gravitaatioaallot, joita syntyy kahden saman esim. alkuaine-atomin pyöriessä toistensa ympäri. Tämä synnyttää gravitaatioaaltoja, jotka saavat vetämään samaa ainetta puoleensa (koska tämä liikkuu kyseisellä gravitaatioaallon aallonpituudella). Kaikilla alkuaineilla on siis oma painovoimansa. Gravitaatioaallon värähdyslaajuuden (amplitudin) määrää se, miten paljon kyseistä ainetta on pyörimässä toistensa ympäri. Mitä suurempi aineen atomi on, sitä suurempi aallonpituus. Tämän seurauksena esim. maapallon kohdalla, jonka ydin koostuu paljolti raudasta, vetää vahvasti puoleensa rauta-atomeja. Toisaalta esim. kaasuja, kuten vetyä, on(?) maapallon sisällä vähän, joten niihin ei ole vahvaa gravitaationaalista vetoa maan puolelta, mutta muilla planeetoilla ja auringolla taas on.
Tämä ilmiö on havaittavissa esim. vuorovesi-ilmiössä, jossa kuu (43% happea), vetää puoleensa vettä, mutta myöskin aurinko (73,46% vetyä), vetää vettä puoleensa.

Tässä Newton erehtyi teoriani mukaan: 
Tyhjiössä kiinteä kappale ei liiku (olettaen että painovoima-aallot eivät ole niin vahvoja, että repivät kappaleen palasiksi), vaan kaikki muu liikkuu sinun ympärillä, sen mukaan miten kovasti mitäkin alkuainetta planeetat ja tähdet vetävät puoleensa. Se vaikuttaa entropialta, koska vetäviä voimia universumissa on niin paljon, että materiaali vaikuttaa kun sitä vedettäisiin joka suuntaan. Mitä siinä tapahtuukin.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E43-CfukEgs
Tämä on havaittavissa tällä videolla, jossa vaikuttaa, kuin höyhen ja keilapallo tippuvat yhtä aikaa maahan. Todellisuudessa höyhen ja keilapallo pysyvät tyhjiössä paikallaan, ja maapallo on se mikä liikkuu (pyörimisnopeutensa mukaan). Siitä tuleekin Newtonin 9,81  m/s2, jota ollaan ymmärretty painovoimana, sen voimakkuutena. Tämä ei teoriani mukaan pidä paikkaansa. Jos painovoima ei paikallaan olevaan hiukkaseen vaikuta, niin sitten se on paikallaan (ajatellaan vaikka tyhjiötä). Muu universumi jatkaa liikkumista, mutta tämä hiukkanen ei liiku, ennenkuin tulee juurikin painovoima-aaltoja aiheuttava sama alkuaine, joka saa hiukkasen liikkeelle. 
Eli esim. asteroidi on paikallaan avaruudessa (ellei pyöri ja näin tee omaa painovoimaa). Kun esim. maapallon liikerata törmää asteroidin kanssa, tapahtuu jomminkummin: Jos ei ole samaa alkuainetta maassa, kuin asteroidissa, se törmää siihen (siis maa törmää asteroidiin). Jos on samaa alkuainetta, niin riippuen maan vetovoimasta asteroidia kohtaan, asteroidi voi jäädä kiertämään planeetan kehää (etäisyys riippuu miten paljon maa vetää asteroidin alkuaineita puoleensa). Tämä selittää myös esim. saturnuksen renkaan.

Tämän virheen vuoksi olemme ”luoneet” kaikki nämä voimat, kuten kitka, paine, lämpötila jne., vaikka olisimme tarvinneet näiden ilmiöiden selittämiseen vain painovoiman.

Myös ajatellessa atomeja, tämä voisi selittää miksi elektronit kiertävät protonia ja neutronia tietyllä orbitaalilla, sillä protonin ja neutronin pyörintä toistensa ympäri saa aikaan gravitaatioaallon, johon elektronit jäävät, ja värähdyslaajuus kertoo kuinka lujasti se pitää niitä radallaan. Tämän vuoksi elektronit ovat niin aktiivisia, koska niiden ”sinkoaminen” tältä radalta vaatii suhteellisen pienen voiman.

Kemiassa meille on opetettu, että elektronit tekevät liitoksia atomien välille (molekyylejä). Teoriani selittää, mistä tämä johtuu, Elektronit kiertävät orbitaalilla, ja reagoivat toisten atomien gravitaatioaaltoihin.
Sanomme kemiassa lämmön olevan liikettä. Teoriani selittää mistä tämä liike on peräisin. Jos ajatellaan vaikka molekyyliä kuten vesi, niin vesiatomi pysyy yhdessä (vety ja happi), jos gravitaatio ei vedä niitä irti toisistaan. Jos gravitaatio on riittävän vahva, molekyyli hajoaa (höyrystyminen). Jos liikettä ei ole, vesi ottaa kiinteän muodon (jäätyy). Jos tasapaino on sopiva, vesi pysyy vetenä.


Esimerkkejä
Tässä on esimerkkejä, miten teoriani täsmää nykytietämyksen kanssa (toki teorian on käytävä yksiin kaiken muunkin kanssa oikeassa ollakseen!). Nämä menevät hypoteesien puolelle, sillä en ole perehtynyt ilmiöihin/teorioihin tarpeeksi (alojen tiedemiehet varmaan ymmärtävät asiat paremmin, kun tarkastelevat asiaa teoriani pohjalta), otin nämä vain esimerkiksi, koska nykytieteellä on ollut näiden asioiden kanssa ongelmia:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tämä gravitaatioaalto-teoria on(?) kokeellisesti todistettavissa, esim. alla olevan linkin kokeessa, jossa hyrrän pyörintä luo jopa miljardikertaisin painovoiman verrattu maan painovoimaan. kyseisellä materiaalilla tietysti (tässä tapauksessa kalsiumkarbonaattiatomeilla).
Eli toisin sanoen, mitä käsitämme ”keinotekoisena” gravitaationa, on samaa gravitaatiota, mitä kaikki gravitaatio.
Jos teoriani pitää paikkansa, voisi tämä päteä kaikilla partikkeleilla.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Otetaan vaikka lintujen navigointi, on kvanttimekaniikassa ehdotettu, että se johtuu alkuaineesta linnun nokassa (tai silmässä), jonka mukaan lintu osaa navigoida. Jos tuota ajatellaan minun teorian pohjalta, niin kyseistä alkuainetta vetää puoleensa sen alkuaineen gravitaatioaallot, joten lintu pystyy määrittämään sijaintinsa tuon gravitaation pohjalta. Tästä johtuu myös, miksi linnut lentävät röykkiöissä, niin että vaikuttaa kun ne tietäisivät mihin toiset menevät. Todellisuudessa kaikki seuraavat samaa viestiä, eli alkuaineen painovoimaa.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Olisiko suprajohde selitettävissä myös tällä teorialla? Eli kun metalliatomit (joita maankuoren sisällä on) luovat gravitaatioaaltoja, ne vaikuttavat maanpinnalla oleviin metalleihin, kukin kokoluokkansa mukaan. Kun metallia jäähdytetään, irtoaa se maan luomasta gravitaatioaallosta, ja ns. leijuu, eli sitä pitää ilmassa sen omat gravitaatioaallot. Hyvin pikaisesti asiaa pohdin, voi olla toisin.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gravitaatioaallot voisivat myös selittää pimeän aineen, joka on oikeasti gravitaatioaaltoja.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gravitaatioaaltoteoria selittäisi myös tämän, sillä esim. planeettojen alkuaineiden gravitaatioaallot vetävät luontainten materiaalia puoleensa, mutta voima on vähäinen etäisyyden vuoksi (samalla tavalla kun em. esimerkki, jossa auringon synnyttämät gravitaatioaallot vaikuttavat vain vähän valon kulkuun).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Teoria selittää myös planeettojen perihelikiertymän, sillä planeettojen atomeja vetävät puoleensa kaikki planeetat, joissa kyseistä alkuainetta on tarpeeksi.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Selittäisi myös miksi tarkatkin vaa-at heittävät painossa, koska tiettyä materiaalia vedetään jatkuvasti eri suuntiin, riippuen mistä alkuaineista se koostuu, joten sen "paino" muuttuu sen mukaan. Siksi kappale painaa eri verran kuussa kuin maassa. Vika ei ole vaa-assa, vaan kappaleen paino muuttuu kokoajan sen mukaan, miten kappaleen eri alkuaineita vedetään puoleensa, maan ja muiden taivaankappaleiden vaikutuksesta.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ja miksi materia liikkuisi aaltomaisesti, jos materialla ei olisi aallonpituutta?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jos metallejakin lämmitetään tarpeeksi, ne alkavat käyttäytyä kuin vesi, aaltomaisesti, koska kaikki fyysinen käyttäytyy samoin.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Teslakäämin selittää se, että siinä elektroneja pyöritetään toistensa ympäri, ne vetävät gravitaatioaalloilla muita elektroneja puoleensa. Tämä selittää myös salaman.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Teoria selittää myös, miksi materia resonoi myös. Selittää esim. siltojen ja rakennusten murtumisen.
http://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resonanssi
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tämä video esittää hyvin, kuinka gravitaatioaallot toimivat.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGiiSlMFFlI
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sentrifuugilla materiaa pyörittämällä voisi testata mahdollisesti teoriaani,
olettaen, että siinä on tarpeeksi kierrosnopeutta teoriani gravitaatio-aaltojen luontiin.

Koe olisi harvinaisen yksinkertainen. Eli alkaako sentrifugi vetää puoleensa materiaa, mitä pyöritetään siellä sisällä. Pitää muistaa turvallisuus!


tshuovin@gmail.com